Roots

Roots

Report Dead | Write A Review | Add Pros | Add Cons

About Roots

Fast, flexible, and well-maintained static site generator written in node.

22 Roots Alternatives & Competitors


192

reStructuredText

Invented for Python documentation.


91

Grav

The modern open source flat-file CMS


91
Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.


91
Nanoc

Nanoc

A static-site generator written in Ruby


91
HEXO+

HEXO+

Autonomous (drone) aerial camera


1

Webhook

The easiest way to build a custom CMS for your next website.


1

Wintersmith

Flexible, minimalistic, multi-platform static site generator built on top of node.js


91

JBake

“Jekyll of the JVM”


91
Nikola

Nikola

Nikola is s static site generator tool written in Python.


91

Breeze Bakery

Not technically snow ice, but a popular bingsoo location nonetheless.


92
Jekyll

Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.


91
Appernetic

Appernetic

Appernetic is a web service for managing and generating static content for GitHub Pages.


91

Harp

The static web server with built-in preprocessing.


91

Assemble

The static site generator for Node.js, Grunt.js and Yeoman


75

Sitegen

Frontend Development


1
Octopress

Octopress

A static blogging framework for hackers, based on Jekyll


192
Metalsmith

Metalsmith

An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator.

Roots Pros

Active development

Quick deploys

Dynamic content

Currently going through an upgrade

Custom compilers

Multipass compiles

Client-side templates

Quick

Roots Cons

No i18n (Internationalization)

Roots reviews

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.